I'm no scientist but this is probably why your dog hates being on the leash.When at 3 months I was teaching him to go for walks, I made him stop at every intersection and only cross when I said lets go. When he waited by himself he got praise, or occasionally a treat, when he stepped off the curb by himself I yanked on the leash hard enough to pull him flying backwards through the air and then sternly yelled NO.
Yes that seems to be the overwhelming consensus but it's the reasoning behind that which is what has me wondering. I kind of expected it to focus around the collars being too painful but instead it seems like the discouragement has nothing to do with the effect of the collar rather than a rejection of negative reinforcement altogether. The pain issue is a big deal to me since obviously I don't want to be touring our baby but I don't really understand the idea that negative associations don't work since in my experience they clearly have.Putting aside the whole leash discussion, the bottom line is that we are all STRONGLY discouraging you from putting a shock collar on your dog. It's just a really, really bad idea.
Simba doesn't at all hate being on a leash, he actually walks quite well on one, he doesn't pull nor cross in front of your feat.I'm no scientist but this is probably why your dog hates being on the leash.
Philip,Yes that seems to be the overwhelming consensus but it's the reasoning behind that which is what has me wondering. I kind of expected it to focus around the collars being too painful but instead it seems like the discouragement has nothing to do with the effect of the collar rather than a rejection of negative reinforcement altogether. The pain issue is a big deal to me since obviously I don't want to be touring our baby but I don't really understand the idea that negative associations don't work since in my experience they clearly have.
Yes that seems to be the overwhelming consensus but it's the reasoning behind that which is what has me wondering. I kind of expected it to focus around the collars being too painful but instead it seems like the discouragement has nothing to do with the effect of the collar rather than a rejection of negative reinforcement altogether. The pain issue is a big deal to me since obviously I don't want to be touring our baby but I don't really understand the idea that negative associations don't work since in my experience they clearly have.
on the whole leash thing I do agree that some sort of off leash play and exercise is very beneficial for dogs but it has to be in a safe environment.
I have lost a family dog when the dog was simply off leash in front of our house which was on a very quiet street, he ran off to a larger busier street where someone was speeding and he got hit.
Using leashes is not a substitute for training recall, its for places where being off leash is either illegal and/or unsafe.
An on leash walk can also be an opportunity for brain exercises. Teaching the dog to focus on you when surronded by exciting stimuli (build this up slowely), its a chance to socialise and desensitise dogs to be in a crowd, particularly if you live in a city.
Dogs need to be trained to behave on leash and off leash.
This isn't what the op is considering though...Like anything else in life people malign and fear something they do not understand.
When used by someone who know what they are doing it is a very motivational tool. My dogs tails wag a mile a minute when put on. Mild stimulant (vibrate) is paired with a positive reinforcer like play, a tug toy, even high value treat. It is used to fine tune specific behaviors. Kinda like marking moment of perfect performance without a clicker. Unlike a clicker you can mark behavior from any distance or location.
The dog world is full of ignorance and generalizing. Always amused when people see how positive it can be used then it blows all their closed minded paradigms out the water. Don't form opinions by what some idiots do with them. I would hope people here are better than that. Watch/speak to people who use it to bring out the best in their dogs in a positive motivational way.
Like anything else in life people malign and fear something they do not understand.
When used by someone who know what they are doing it is a very motivational tool. My dogs tails wag a mile a minute when put on. Mild stimulant (vibrate) is paired with a positive reinforcer like play, a tug toy, even high value treat. It is used to fine tune specific behaviors. Kinda like marking moment of perfect performance without a clicker. Unlike a clicker you can mark behavior from any distance or location.
The dog world is full of ignorance and generalizing. Always amused when people see how positive it can be used then it blows all their closed minded paradigms out the water. Don't form opinions by what some idiots do with them. I would hope people here are better than that. Watch/speak to people who use it to bring out the best in their dogs in a positive motivational way.
I've seen and own dogs who were so determined to achieve the unwanted behaviour that anything that would counteract it would be abuse, seriously. They learned to wait until we were out of the room to steal and in case of a Beagle there is no amount of punishment and pain that can convince him to stop sniffing the ground on a walk, a smelly sausage however can...Depending on what the behavior was you would use a appropriate level of stim to achieve the result you wanted. No digoing in trash, chasing cars, etc.
obviously vibrate has no negative association. Your command with stim them immediate positive such as praise, play, treat etc when dog makes that choice to ignore the trash. Depending on how intense the desire for the unwanted behavior is you have to make your authority that much more powerful. Unwanted behavior is unwanted behavior. Simply make it clear what it is you want from the dog.
No grey area.