I would teach him a quiet cue or leave it instead of calling him to you.
Posted via Mobile Device
Posted via Mobile Device
You are reinforcing his coming to you.- Dog does something I don't like, say barking.
- I call him, he comes.
- He gets a treat
So it's pointless to try to prevent this behaviour altogether?I would teach him a quiet cue or leave it instead of calling him to you.
Posted via Mobile Device
This ^ but you could inadvertently create a behavior chain: bark > recall > treat.You are reinforcing his coming to you.
This ^ but you could inadvertently create a behavior chain: bark > recall > treat.
Right, this is exactly what I was concerned about.Lol - I'm no trainer, but it sounds like he's training you how to give him a treat.![]()
How do you go about preventing behaviour with positive reinforcement? So far it's only been useful to reinforce behaviour he already does.I would work on preventing behaviors you find undesirable and training more acceptable, incompatible or alternative behaviors.
You don't use positive reinforcement to prevent behaviors, you use management. What behaviors are you concerned about?How do you go about preventing behaviour with positive reinforcement? So far it's only been useful to reinforce behaviour he already does.
That kind of depends on why the dog is barking and, in my experience, counter conditioning for that particular scenario is difficult to do. For barking at dogs walking past the house you may want to work on prevention (e.g., window coverings, blocking access) as kmes said.after looking it up apparently you're supposed to use counter-conditioning, if I got it right it basically means you have to feed a high value treat whenever a trigger shows up to prevent the action from happening in the first place. I'm not entirely sure how i'm gonna replicate dogs walking by the house, i may have to ask a friend to bring her dog.
thanks for all the feedback, incompatible behavior sounds fairly similar to what i described above.