A few thoughts...
I don't know how they can determine status as low or high. Given the reasons the study gave for WHY dogs mark, making a jump to certain status assumption seems overreaching. First of all, without observing these dogs in a regular setting over a long period, determining overall personality at a dog patk is generalizing overmuch. perhaps these dogs are more social and confident, therefore like to leave little clues about themselves all over the place. Second, the study itself draws on other studies for base line info (ie tail height) and som studies have shown tail height has more to do with mood and temperament than status. Being an article, there wasn't enough study info for me to have an opinion on it's validity but it seems sketchy. It may be that the people doing the study had a bias going in and therefor did not ask ALL pertinent questions but limited observations to fit already established memes and theories. I need to reed the published trial, not an article about it.
What did the other dog do when it was pee'd on is the more pertinent info for me. An insult is only an insult if the person (dog) being insulted is, in fact, insulted. Maybe getting pee'd on after a dispute is putting an end to further dispute..a one and done stamp
I don't know how they can determine status as low or high. Given the reasons the study gave for WHY dogs mark, making a jump to certain status assumption seems overreaching. First of all, without observing these dogs in a regular setting over a long period, determining overall personality at a dog patk is generalizing overmuch. perhaps these dogs are more social and confident, therefore like to leave little clues about themselves all over the place. Second, the study itself draws on other studies for base line info (ie tail height) and som studies have shown tail height has more to do with mood and temperament than status. Being an article, there wasn't enough study info for me to have an opinion on it's validity but it seems sketchy. It may be that the people doing the study had a bias going in and therefor did not ask ALL pertinent questions but limited observations to fit already established memes and theories. I need to reed the published trial, not an article about it.
What did the other dog do when it was pee'd on is the more pertinent info for me. An insult is only an insult if the person (dog) being insulted is, in fact, insulted. Maybe getting pee'd on after a dispute is putting an end to further dispute..a one and done stamp