Much of the argument about dog training methods comes from misunderstanding. Yes, the silly dominant alpha take down thing for example to make the dog show submission i not going to be productive ... but that doesn't mean that dogs do not exhibit any pack behaviors. Human families also exhibit "pack" behaviors. Most of the disagreement comes from not fully understanding what is involved. It's kinda like when we see it said that "stubborn" is not a canine behavior but a human one. Well check the dictionary and we see the the literal definition of "stubborn" is
"having or showing dogged determination not to change one's attitude or position on something". Stubborness in humans is literally defined as "behaving like a dog". Semantics.
A family has a leader, they eat together, they protect one another, they play together.... one person, sometimes 2 prepare all the meals. Is it really important what label you put on it ? The point is the behavioral parallels between dogs and people are undeniable. Call it a pack ... call it a family ... call it an "inter-species partnership", it really doesn't matter what label you put on it, recognizing the parallels is what matters because that produces a compatible dynamic whereby everyone gets along.
Yes, what is happening when she's distracted is because you're boring and this new thing is exciting. Distracting her with something "more interesting" can provide short term results but what about when that gets boring ? Success in this area is dependent on both early training and genetics, neither one can be ignored. We have two Shepherd / Husky mixes. The older one people swear is a purebred GSD, but her brain is all Husky and she runs off every chance she gets. Guess which breed garbers the highest "wanderlust" quotient ? Treats ? She can't be bothered... toss a treat and it lands 10 inches from a bed, she won't even get up. Not having absolute control over a dog that weighs over 60 pounds can have very negative results.
Arm yourself with multiple techniques to find what your dogs genetics and early life resulted in her their current behaviors. If treats work, by all means work it . If your dog is more interested in squirrels then treats, be prepared to employ other methods. It's popular in some circles that positive reinforcement is the only acceptable method of training. Behavioral Science says otherwise; BF Skinner was the 1st to show that combining positive and negative reinforcement together proved to be the most expedient method of behavioral modification. Where the arguments start is when people confuse negative reinforcement with negative stimuli or punishment... they are not the same thing. When you leave for work early because you do not want to get stuck in traffic, your behavior was modified by negative reinforcement ... you want to avoid something.
When you feed the dogs if they get all jumpy and crazy, don't put the bowl down until they stop the negative behavior and do something you want. I spent 4 years in responsible charge of a group of GSD's at a day camp for the arts (music, dance, sculpture, painting), outside the camp hours (9 - 3) they had full reign of the grounds. You could not display what was oft called "typical pack dominance behavior" by being bossy, the older / larger one would have none of it and you'd regret it. Negative reinforcement worked well ... again,that doesn't mean exposing the dog to a negative stimulus, taking away the “less pleasant reinforcer.” Removing the negative stimulus (me standing there witholding the reward until she exhibits positive behavior ) is, in and of itself, a “reward
When feeding, what eventually was found useful and which we used then and now was combining both negative and positive reinforcement. When dog(s) exhibit undesired behavior a short nonsense syllable or clicker can be used to say "look at me and pay attention"... this breaks the focus on the undesired behavior... and experience let's them know "something wonderful is likely gonna happen". But 1st you need to get their attention. Now with the attention on you... follow with a recognized command such as sit .... combine body language, tone and the reward (food bowl is placed). Repeat the technique at the door when going out, when strangers arrive, when walking the dog ... dog pulls... hit clicker, stop.. when she sits resume walking ... she's hot to explore and see new things.... she gets what she wants when she exhibits desired behavior.
I have been using this on the older GDD / Husky mix. I started out with 10 (33ft) meter retractable .... now I'm using a 150 foot surveyors tape.... it works better for this purpose because it doesn't constantly exert a pull on the dog... the pull represents control and you can't train responsiveness when the dog feels that you never gave up control. The surveyor's tape is light and it provides a sense of freedom. As she gets out to about 125 feet, I'll say "Enh" ... she stops, she looks waiting for what comes next. A clicker works also, but I always have "enh" with me. With her, treats are iffy .... if I don't change it up, she will start still stop with an "enh", look at me and give me that not interested look. Engaging in play has proved a better reward with her... but even that gets boring. So trips to the dog park, play dates, walks to new routes ... like a marriage... gotta keep it fresh. Experience will tell you what they like to do .... what drives them .... look to their breeding, remember the dogs were bred to display these characteristics. Again, not very different from humans ... parents work with their kids to find what interests them .... with my oldest, it was baseball, 2nd oldest track and building computers the 3rd was a little bit of everything. Doing them together was a feedback loop because parent and child / owner and dog genuinely enjoy pleasseing the other.... well maybe not teenagers