I'm not a huge fan of Dogs Naturally. I do read the magazine and find a lot of it interesting, and often helpful. But, they're absolutely horrific when it comes to properly citing their sources and actually having research backing their claims. They have referred to books and articles that I literally CANNOT FIND in all of google with the info they provided. It's like it just doesn't exist. I'm actually perfectly fine with somebody writing about a topic not having a whole lot of support for their thoughts, but at least be honest that it's more speculation and possibility, and discuss your resources more in depth. Don't claim unsupported ideas as fact and fear monger.