Inaccuracies, Fear Mongering, and DNM

Go Back   Dog Forum > Keeping and Caring for Dogs > Dog Health

Inaccuracies, Fear Mongering, and DNM

This is a discussion on Inaccuracies, Fear Mongering, and DNM within the Dog Health forums, part of the Keeping and Caring for Dogs category; ...

User Tag List

Like Tree50Likes

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-15-2015, 04:43 PM
  #1
Senior Member
 
Aurora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 228
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Inaccuracies, Fear Mongering, and DNM

I post rarely. I mostly just read. But I have been incredibly bothered as the inaccurate information regarding vaccines and pest preventatives on this forum grows. Shouldn't this be regulated or something? It's not safe or productive to post so many things that aren't true and that may affect people's choices with their dogs.

First, Dogs Naturally Magazine is inaccurate and is a bunch of fear mongering. Even the title is biased. When I learned how to do research papers in middle school, the first thing I was taught is to avoid biased sources. This is a biased source.
Article discussing the scientific inaccuracies of DNM:
https://dogbehaviorscience.wordpress...ally-magazine/

As for the dangers of vaccines: There aren't that many. You know what the real danger is? Not vaccinating. I urge you to look at the stats in India, where their feral dog population is out of control. 18,000-20,000 people die every year of rabies from the feral dogs. Have you ever seen a video of a dog with rabies? Or a human for that matter? Heartbreaking. If I didn't think I would get in trouble, I would post one. Why is the rabies vaccine demonized so hard by some people on this forum? Rabies is probably the worst disease you could get. The EXTREMELY rare (if they even exist) reactions that a few dogs have to these vaccines are SO much better than actually getting the disease. I have seen too many things on this forum that are just not true regarding vaccination. This forum claims to be science based.

Now, I know no one said that no one should ever get vaccines. But I think people need to stop promoting that vaccines are dangerous on a public forum. It's irresponsible. Vaccines are not dangerous. There is no science supporting that they are. They are the best thing that has happened to dog ownership and keep our dogs happy and healthy, not dying of rabies or parvo or distemper.

Should we over vaccinate? Probably not. Is it the worst thing ever? No. I've seen some truly inaccurate information on this forum over the past while, and I can only hold my tongue for so long. I would love to point out some instances of things I seriously do not agree with, but I don't want to seem like I am attacking anyone, because that is not my purpose. My purpose is to hopefully start a discussion on inaccurate information found on the Internet, and NOT recommending such information to people.

Also, just for the record, Natural does not equal "good" and man-made does not equal "bad".

Sources:
Rabies Vaccines & Aggression in Dogs-Pure Pseudoscientific Fear Mongering | The SkeptVet
Antibody Titer Testing as a Guide for Vaccination in Dogs and Cats | The SkeptVet
Routine Vaccinations for Dogs & Cats: Trying to Make Evidence-based Decisions | The SkeptVet
“One and Done” Approach to Rabies Vaccination is Misguided and Dangerous | The SkeptVet

Other sources to come.

Last edited by Aurora; 12-15-2015 at 04:50 PM.
Aurora is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2015, 04:53 PM
  #2
Dog Forum ModeraTHOR
 
kmes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 11,910
Mentioned: 486 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Honestly I think you've seen post from just a few with perhaps more extreme views...
The majority of people here do vaccinate. May have differing views on when/how often but ultimately do support core puppy vaccinations and rabies according to law.

If you see someone advising members not to provide core vaccinations and rabies then please report it so us mods can take a look and if needed take action.
Posted via Mobile Device
Rain, KayWilson, crazy and 4 others like this.
kmes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2015, 04:58 PM
  #3
Senior Member
 
Aurora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 228
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Inaccuracies, Fear Mongering, and DNM

You're right, I may have. I admit to not paying much attention to who posts what when I see the posts. I just see them a lot. I never meant to imply that the majority of people are not vaccinating, but just that I don't think inaccurate info should be posted in the first place. Fear mongering has become such a problem in "the age of information".

People come here to get information, and trust that the information is correct. This why I think it's so important that information posted here be correct and science-based.

Last edited by Aurora; 12-15-2015 at 05:01 PM.
Aurora is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 12-15-2015, 07:59 PM
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 10,928
Mentioned: 359 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Personally, I do vaccinate my pets. Vaccines are generally safe and safer than most things in modern veterinary medicine, IMO. In the end, it's for each and every owner to decide what's best for their dog. I'm sure someone that's against vaccinating their dogs could counter everything you've posted. I'm not saying it's true here but I do think people will state opinions as fact or science at times. Live and let live, I guess.
Gnostic Dog likes this.

Last edited by ColliesRock; 12-15-2015 at 08:02 PM.
ColliesRock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2015, 08:14 PM
  #5
Senior Member
 
Gnostic Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 662
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
World Small Animal Veterinary Association Vaccination Guidelines

http://www.wsava.org/sites/default/f...elines2010.pdf
Gnostic Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2015, 08:17 PM
  #6
Senior Member
 
Gnostic Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 662
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
WSAVA puppy vaccination guidelines

http://www.wsava.org/sites/default/f...029%202013.pdf
Gnostic Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2015, 08:17 PM
  #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 10,928
Mentioned: 359 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
I will say I personally do think that all dog should at least get Parvo and rabies vaccinations. Not only can a dog get Parvo but they could also give it to other dogs and other people's dogs.
Rain, crazy and Cynna like this.
ColliesRock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2015, 08:19 PM
  #8
Senior Member
 
Laco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,092
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
As is everything in medicine, it always boils down to risk vs benefit. I, personally am not willing to take the risk of not vaccinating our dog. As is the case with anything that goes into the body, ours, or our pets, including the things we eat and drink, there is always the possibility of some sort of reaction. For those of us that can interpret what we read about vaccines, its clear that the risk of reaction from vaccines is very slight, the risk of contracting diseases such as parvo or rabies and the results are so horrible and deadly, it becomes a no brainer. On the human side, can you imagine the human toll if smallpox and polio were still around.
cookieface, icemaiden and Aurora like this.
Laco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2015, 09:39 PM
  #9
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,350
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
ive noticed it too. It did get to me a few times. does anyone know the rules about vaccinating senior dogs who are nearly 11 years?

ETA i thought dogs naturally magazine wasnt false and believed in it but then on a group on facebook raw feeding chat heard it isnt trustworthy and since re assesed and beleive its not right esp as i saw a video posted by mercola about raw feeding and vets and didnt like the way it sounded pressuried to feed raw( what about those who cant feed raw)?
crazy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2015, 10:16 PM
  #10
Senior Member
 
Gnostic Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 662
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy View Post
does anyone know the rules about vaccinating senior dogs who are nearly 11 years?
There are no "rules". Remember vaccines are only for healthy animals. If the 11-year-old is healthy, and that means, no allergies, intolerances, auto-immune issues, lumps and bumps etc, then maybe, but given the guidelines below, but why not titre instead?

From the link above:

Quote:
2. Vaccines should not be given needlessly. Core vaccines are those that are required by every dog in order to protect them from life-threatening infectious diseases that remain prevalent throughout the world. Core vaccines should not be given any more frequently than every three years after the 12 month booster injection following the puppy/kitten series, because the duration of immunity (DOI) is known to be many years and may be up to the lifetime of the pet.

6. The WSAVA supports the use of titre testing. This is where a small sample of blood is taken from the dog and checked for the presence of circulating antibodies. The presence of circulating antibodies indicates that the dog is immune, and revaccination (with core vaccines) is not required. You may decide to titre test before giving the 12 month booster, as this may show that boosting is unnecessary. New in-practice titre-testing kits are now available which will allow your veterinarian to do a titre test very quickly, without sending the blood sample to a laboratory.

7. It is important to give as few vaccines as possible, whilst also ensuring that dogs are protected from life-threatening viral and bacterial diseases. The WSAVA seeks to reduce the number of vaccines given as there is always a risk of adverse reactions with any vaccination. The risk of adverse reaction is considered small and the WSAVA asserts that the benefit of protecting your pet from life-threatening infections far outweighs the risk of adverse reaction – although any reaction to a vaccine that is not needed is unacceptable. The WSAVA has listed the types of reactions in its vaccine guidelines (which you can see on the link given above). They range from mild (such as fever, loss of appetite), through to severe (such as epilepsy, arthritis, autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, and allergic reactions). The most severe adverse effects can be life-threatening.
How many vet's follow these guidelines?
Cynna likes this.
Gnostic Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Dog Stairs - Dog Steps - Quality Pet Products
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.1.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.