Go Back   Dog Forum > Keeping and Caring for Dogs > General Dog Discussion

An Open Letter to Dog Owners

This is a discussion on An Open Letter to Dog Owners within the General Dog Discussion forums, part of the Keeping and Caring for Dogs category; Fellow pet owner, My name is Colin Weaver. I am 37 years old. I am probably a lot like you in that I have had ...

Cooking
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-09-2009, 10:05 AM
  #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1
An Open Letter to Dog Owners

Fellow pet owner,

My name is Colin Weaver. I am 37 years old. I am probably a lot like you in that I have had a dog and/or a cat as part of my family for all but a tiny handful of years in my life. My current dog, a 4-year old Weimaraner named Seven, is not just a pet; she is a member of my family. Taking care of her and protecting her is no less a responsibility than taking care of my 3-year old daughter.

In addition to being a dog lover I am also an enthusiastic reptile fan. In particular I have an affinity for pythons. This fact, I suspect, will immediately distance some of you. Pythons are not conventional pets and because pythons are enigmatic they are often feared. Despite their fast-growing popularity, they are on the edge of mainstream pet ownership. It is true that reptiles do not show the same affection toward their owners that dogs and cats do. The opposite, however, is not true. The way you feel about your dog or cat is the way that many feel about their reptiles. For the moment I ask that you not judge the particular animal that some choose to make a part of their lives. For now, just focus on the way you feel about your pets and give credit to reptile owners for feeling the same way about their companions.

In the United States dog ownership is under constant attack. The source of this attack is most commonly the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). Volumes have been written on the Internet about their deceptive ways but they continue to be successful in launching attacks against pet owners (and breeders) around the country. I know your frustration regarding this because I feel it, too. Dogs are only one of several targets of the HSUS. Reptile keepers are also struggling with the HSUS' powerful lobbying skills. At this moment there is a bill in Congress called HR2811 which seeks a nationwide ban on many of the most popular reptiles in the pet community (the Senate version of the bill is called S373). At a recent hearing in the House a team of more than 25 HSUS members were present to forward their efforts to get this bill made into law.

The reasons proposed for this ban are false. They are being sensationalized by the HSUS and this is being compounded by the media. South Florida does have a problem with a population of pythons having established themselves in the Everglades. This problem, which is isolated to extreme South Florida is being used as a point of leverage to ban the ownership of pythons and boas throughout the entire United States. There are two primary points of the HSUS argument:

1.The HSUS and USGS feel that the python might be able to spread north from Florida and establish itself in the lower 1/3 of the United States.
  • Because pythons cannot control their own body temperature this is simply not possible. Highly experienced reptile veterinarians with detailed understanding of reptile physiology have testified to this fact. The ecosystem of South Florida is largely unique in the United States. Their ability to spread north from the Everglades is false and being driven by nothing more than the average person's fear of snakes. Pythons have been kept as pet for not less than 50 years in this country. If they had the ability to establish themselves in other parts of the country, they would likely have done so by now. One of the USGS' selling points on this matter is that global warming over the next 100 years could allow the snakes to survive further north. Is that what we're going to do now? Legislate the pet trade on what might happen in the decades to come? Really? Remember the movie Minority Report starring Tom Cruise? In that movie people were arrested and put in prison for crimes they were going to commit in the future. Banning the ownership of snakes because the temperature might change in the future is just as preposterous. That movie sought to teach us a subtle lesson; it appears that it was not learned.
2.Pythons are a public safety issue.
  • The HSUS states that pythons kill people and are a risk to public health. This is both fear-driven and false. Of the pets that people choose to keep pythons are one of the least likely to be a danger. Severe injury or death because of a python is incredibly rare. It is estimated that more than 5 million Americans own a reptile, several hundred thousand of which are large pythons and boas. Over the past 30 years there have been a total of 12 deaths attributed to large pythons. While nobody should ever discount the value of a life we have to admit that so few deaths in that many years is hardly justification for pythons being a public safety issue. It is worthy to note that none of those 12 deaths was from a python or boa escaping into the wild and attacking someone. Each of those incidents occurred in the home and each was the result of poor caging and/or improper handling. The simple fact of the matter is that responsible ownership of pythons and boas is not a public health concern.
The pythons in the Everglades is a decidedly Florida problem. Florida Fish and Wildlife has jumped on the bandwagon of this ban because federal legislation means federal dollars. The prospect of getting the entire country to fund Everglades restoration is a compelling motivator. In order to generate support for their desired end-result they have begun actively searching for pythons and when found they parade them about on the evening news. The media, and their love of all things sensational, is glad to feature them.

One of the most recent efforts of the HSUS has been to call for a ban on the Boa Constrictor in addition to several python species (they initially tried to ban all pythons). Suggesting a ban on 'boa constrictor' is the same thing as suggesting a ban on all terrier breeds because you feel that pit bulls are a problem. It it absolutely ridiculous. If one of the 15 species of terriers (that's how many my research showed there to be) was a member of your family how would you feel if they were banned because of a HSUS/media-driven view of pit bulls? I hope you would be as frustrated and angry as the reptile community is right now. Similar to the diversity of terriers, there are literally dozens of different types of boa constrictors and most of them are very small as adults. We are in danger of seeing a huge portion of the pet trade eliminated by this proposed legislation. We are scared. We are angry. And we are frustrated.

Now, here is the point of my letter: The reptile community is not large enough to indefinitely withstand the assault being launched by the HSUS and our current political representation is too new and inexperienced to avoid being blindsided by the clever lobbying skills long-since perfected by the HSUS. The passage of this bill is a very real possibility. Because of this I am asking you to help me and the rest of the reptile community. I need your help. Part of my livelihood and my right to responsibly own the pet of my choosing is in danger of being taken away from me. I need you to defend pet ownership in this country by contacting both your delegate in the House of Representatives and your Senator and tell them you oppose HR2811 (the House bill) and S373 (the Senate version of the bill). I need this help because I believe with all my heart that the only way that pet owners in this country are ever going to be safe against the efforts of organizations like the HSUS is for all of us to work together to protect the rights of all pet owners, regardless of what type of pet it is.

Do this for me. Please. I need your help. Make the call to your House delegate and your Senator and I, in return, make myself available to you when you need help in your fight for your right to have the pet of your choosing. It is past time for the pet owners of this country to come together, to form a collective and work as a unit to oppose the HSUS' attacks on responsible pet ownership.
To find out who represents you in the House of Representatives, follow this link: https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

To find out who represents you in the Senate, follow this link: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

HR2811 is currently in committee in the House. Here is a list of the committee members: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/committee.xpd?id=HSJU

Thank you,
Colin Weaver
cmweaver@gmail.com
ColinWeaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 10:40 AM
  #2
Dog Forum Team Member
 
Criosphynx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Som'where between Utopia and Insomnia.
Posts: 11,078
Pijac is all over this already.

unless this is a very very NEW bill, your info is not the same as mine...they want to ban the IMPORT of burms. Nothing more. Which, as som'one who works in the reptile trade, I whole heartedly support.
Criosphynx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 11:00 AM
  #3
Dog Forum Team Member
 
Criosphynx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Som'where between Utopia and Insomnia.
Posts: 11,078
um did som' research and this is an ammended part to a bill that is stuck in commitee...IME bills die there

Quote:
Introduced.Amends the federal criminal code to add the constrictor snake of the species Python genera to the list of injurious species that are prohibited from being shipped or imported into the United States.
Quote:
Suggesting a ban on 'boa constrictor' is the same thing as suggesting a ban on all terrier breeds because you feel that pit bulls are a problem
um IMPORTATION is being banned, not ownership. Iam against WC reptiles 110% so once again, I wholeheartly support the ending of importation. It is NOTHING like a dog ban. At all.

either way you need to re write you letter with less scare tactics.... ownership will not be affected by this. Comparing it to a pit bull ban is wordplay to apeal to dog owners. No one is going to come and take your snakes and euthanize them like a dog ban. The animals born here and living here are NOT affected by this.

Quote:
The reptile community is not large enough to indefinitely withstand the assault being launched by the HSUS and our current political representation is too new and inexperienced to avoid being blindsided by the clever lobbying skills long-since perfected by the HSUS.
funny how we've beaten ever bill we have fought tho. You don't give the industry enough credit. I've written more letters to reps that I can remember. hr669 had major funding too and we beat it. IMO this bill is already dead.

Last edited by Criosphynx; 11-09-2009 at 11:13 AM.
Criosphynx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 03:09 PM
  #4
Senior Member
 
ScentHound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Banned again
Posts: 8,012
HHR 669 was freaking everyone out. I haven't heard anything from it lately. Has it been completely shut down or is it still in commitee?

To add, it is not just the reptile committee they are fighting. Most bills address all non native wildlife owners. They are also taking on a massive pet industry that makes billions off reptile owners, parrot owners, and owners of other exotics.

Hey Crio, the pet store up the road from me had prairie dogs in stock. I was extremely surprised to see them in a store, especially here in cattle country.

Last edited by ScentHound; 11-09-2009 at 03:14 PM.
ScentHound is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 03:18 PM
  #5
Dog Forum Team Member
 
Criosphynx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Som'where between Utopia and Insomnia.
Posts: 11,078
hhaha...praire dogs? they used to sell those in vegas.

last I heard 669 was stuck in commitee, and yes I remember the bird people picking up on it first.

The reps that recieved letters said it was the biggest outcry from the public they had seen in ages. I really don't think HSUS is going to win. The public wont stand for it and I think the reps know that.

either way I don't like it when people bend the truth to promote ANY cause no matter how right they are. HSUS bends the truth, we must be better than that.

Iam a pijac member, I know about this stuff long before the public does.

www.pijac.org. If you keep exotics this is a good site.
Criosphynx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 03:21 PM
  #6
Senior Member
 
Mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 7,579
Thanks for the site Crio. Under laws here in Canada (most provinces) rabbits are considered exotics, and laws governing them could impact keeping furry little bunny butts!!
Mikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 03:23 PM
  #7
Dog Forum Team Member
 
Criosphynx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Som'where between Utopia and Insomnia.
Posts: 11,078
rabbits are exotics? lol. you guys have wild rabbits in canada right?
Criosphynx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 08:27 PM
  #8
Senior Member
 
ScentHound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Banned again
Posts: 8,012
I still say they exist.



669 was ridiculous, and would have ensured that many exotics would have to be euthanized. People would have been able to keep their current pets, but could not sell them, give them away, or transport the across state lines if they moved. Whoever came up with that one was a moron IMO.
ScentHound is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 12:02 AM
  #9
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 95
It is possible that the tales of jackalopes were inspired by sightings of rabbits infected with the Shope papilloma virus also known as Epidermodysplasia verruciformis, which causes the growth of horn- and antler-like tumors in various places on the rabbit's head and body.
stumpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2009, 12:08 AM
  #10
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 95


from wikipedia
It is possible that the tales of jackalopes were inspired by sightings of rabbits infected with the Shope papilloma virus also known as Epidermodysplasia verruciformis, which causes the growth of horn- and antler-like tumors in various places on the rabbit's head and body.
stumpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Cooking
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A letter from a dog MyValentine Dog Stories 13 03-11-2010 07:05 PM
A letter to God about a dog named Abbey MyValentine Dog Stories 3 01-30-2010 08:03 PM
Sleeping with eyes open ScentHound Dog Pictures 6 11-02-2009 03:24 PM
bumps turning into open lesions. boxers Dog Health 3 05-12-2009 04:59 AM


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2