Quote:
Originally Posted by Joachim Understand this: dogs are animals and they have some natural instincts they will follow. Dogs are very social animals and very protective of their territories and in the wild they live a lot like wolves, in packs. |
There's your key phrase.
In the wild, a dog would not (likely) go to a climate he's not "designed" for. Just like you won't find any native Huskies in Miami, you won't find chi's native to Alaska, but we humans have moved dogs out of their natural environments, so the dog's natural temp. control is off - so we give them an adaptation we humans developed. Clothing to protect the body from the elements.
Sure, dogs have hair that serves as their "clothing" but it it not always adequate because of the transplanting.
As far as how they survived without clothes - they didn't wonder to places way outside their "native" climate. That's how. Dobermans probably didn't originate in Siberia, Chihuahuas didn't come from Alaska, etc. and they have no way to get there.
And plus, it's just fun sometimes. Personally, I don't get into it, and even if I did, I have this fluff ball of a dog that would make sizing a NIGHTMARE (learned that with dog boots - never again, he will just have to spend an hour eating snowballs off his feet) but I can see why people do it, and I don't think it has anything to do with "treating them like humans". Not EVERYTHING we do to dogs that's not "in the wild" is anthropomorphic in nature.
Putting clothes on a dog will not strip away their canine drives and instincts. They will still walk, sniff, bark, and pee on things just as well with or without clothes. They can still chase and chew and use body language to communicate. They could still form packs if the situation so inclined. They can still be social. They can still like what they like and be eager to do those things (drives).